Why is abortion wrong facts

Biologically what constitutes a human being? The chemical deoxyribonucleic acid DNA was first discovered in and its genetic function in However, it was the work of James Watson and Francis Crick in the s popularly published in the book The Double Helix in who first discovered its double helix structure that solved the mystery of how genetic instruction could be held in an organism and passed on to another through reproduction.

Since then we have not only known that but also how all genetic information is present in the human zygote. At the moment of conception when the male sperm, with twenty-three chromosomes, and female ovum, with twenty-three chromosomes, unite, to form a forty-six-chromosome human being existing with all the genetic information DNA needed to develop.

No additional or new genetic information is added. In the words of my ethics professor:. At conception, the genotype—the inherited characteristics of an individual human being—is established and will remain in force for the entire life of this individual.

The unborn individual, sharing the same nature with all human beings, is unlike any individual who has been conceived before and is unlike any individual who will ever be conceived again unless she is an identical twin. The question reasoned from philosophy now has an answer. The active internal efficient causation for rational operations i.

Should human laws have an essential connection to morality? Human law consists of certain ordinances, rules, or principles that are reasoned and promoted to be good for everyone. According to Thomas Aquinas, human law, to be good or right, must be derived from natural law. Natural law is grounded in a unifying undeniable principle that enables a human being to flourish according to its nature.

All human law must be derived from natural law, otherwise, it is a perversion. Since the complete human being is present at the moment of conception, all human law should promote good being done to all unborn humans and avoid any and all evils that could be done. Such an unfortunate perversion of human law occurred in a series of U. Supreme Court decisions beginning in five years after the how of DNA became widely known.

The first was Roe v. Wade in which the court decided that a woman has a right to an abortion on demand during the first trimester. Although this decision left open to the states to prohibit abortion after viability, a second case Doe v.

Bolton quickly opened the door to abortion after the first trimester by expanding the health of the mother to virtually anything, thus allowing abortion at any stage of pregnancy. Justice Blackmun who wrote the opinion of the court in Roe v. Wade admitted two things: 1 the court did not decide when life begins:.

We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins. And 2 he admitted if the personhood of the unborn is established, the U. Constitution would guarantee the right to life:. From philosophy and biology, the judiciary finds its answer. And that greater value is that it will develop into a human being that will experience life in a superior way.

This is more than saying that a human life is a potential human being because potential may or may not be actualised. The truth is that everybody agrees with this. And you may be correct. It may well be difficult to argue that preventing a human life from developing into a human being is as bad as killing a human being but there are two things you should keep in mind.

A foetus today means a whole life tomorrow and preventing that just because right now the foetus is not yet a human being, is an exercise in a high level of small-minded pettiness. Second, preventing a human life from developing into a human being has the essential element of murder.

Murder is when one person intentionally ends the life of another person for no good reason, but what is it exactly that makes it such a heinous crime? Which is exactly what happens when you abort a foetus. This may mean that the distinction between human life and human being as the reason for why abortion is wrong, is mere hair-splitting after all. And that would be the reason why abortion is wrong.

Despite the common denominator that runs through all murders — namely the death of the murdered — which makes murder one of the worst crimes that can be committed, some forms of murder are worse than others. Various factors are taken into account when judging how severe a form of murder is, some of the most obvious being intent and motivation. Defenceless, helpless, children. On the contrary, the job of a parent is to nurture and care for their children even past the stage in life where they are perfectly capable of looking after themselves.

The job of a parent is to protect them from all the psychos out there, not to be one of them. A child is the offspring of its parents.

A child is created by its parents. This leads to having many on each side of the debate, such as Judith Thomson and John Noonan. Thomson makes many valid analogies in support of abortion in comparison to Noonan who just refutes basic arguments for abortion, and it is for this reason that Thomson is more persuasive.

What it would be like to kill someone so young and fragile? Abortion to my definition is the taking of life. Nowadays more and more teens are getting pregnant and having abortions secretly and easily.

Even their parents have no idea about. Term Paper: Abortion Generally, abortion means the intentionally termination a pregnancy before normal childbirth. Now, the topic abortion is worldwide endless intentionally termination a pregnancy before normal childbirth. The debate mainly focuses on the rights and wrongs of the result of abortion which kills the fetus. It 's one of the most opposing moral issues. Most people are on the side whether totally agree or totally disagree, negligible people are the middle liner.

Pro-abortion groups, who. He argues that all cases of abortion is wrong and rarely will there be special circumstances to justify the killing of a human being.

In Marquis's opinion, killing a fetus is equal to killing an innocent adult life. We cannot permit the completion of this challenge to God, a new Tower of Babel, which will be like another Pandora's box, unleashing untold ethical and moral havoc on our nation. Abortion is a sin that perpetuates evil. The abortion mentality destroys the family by making it more difficult for new Americans who survive beyond the womb to find the family welded together by the indissoluble bond of marriage solely between a man and a woman.

Children need families that will nurture them, guard their innocence and develop their personalities. In particular, all children must find within their homes the Faith that enables them to know, love and serve God in this world and be happy with Him forever in the next.

As long as the traditional family remains in crisis, we will never sever the power lines that supply the abortion mills. As long as the Faith remains dead in souls, we will never wipe out the moral rot of sexual immorality, which is the contaminated soil where the abortion movement grows and flourishes. Wade decision legalizing abortion-on-demand calls to mind the biggest pack of lies ever set in motion -- lies that have cost the lives of more than 60 million innocent babies cruelly torn from their mothers' wombs.

The unborn baby's heart starts beating at 24 days and brainwaves can be recorded after 43 days. Babies can survive outside the womb at 22 weeks. Yesterday it was contraception. Today it's abortion and same-sex "marriage. Then death camps for everyone else deemed ideologically "undesirable"?

Once abortion is universally accepted, what logical arguments will stop euthanasia and other forms of murder and tyranny? Footnotes: 1. Journal of the National Cancer Institute: "Risk of breast cancer among young women: relationship to induced abortion," accessed on June 20, Patrick Schneider, Christine M.